Skip to main content

Transport for London Fare Evasion Solicitors

Facing action from Transport for London for fare evasion can be a stressful and uncertain experience, particularly if you’re concerned about the possibility of legal action.

Enquire NowCall us

As a team of specialist fare evasion solicitors, we’ve helped thousands of clients navigate the challenges and legal requirements of cases involving Transport for London. Led by renowned industry professional Samir Moftah, we excel in achieving outcomes that minimise the stress and consequences on our clients' lives. This includes everything from challenging Penalty Fares to representing clients in potential prosecution cases.

Contact us today and discover how we can assist with all matters relating to fare evasion involving Transport for London.

Why choose Manak Solicitors as your Transport for London Fare Evasion Solicitor?

Transport for London has its own extensive process for dealing with fare evasion across its transport network. Its robust approach to penalties and prosecutions has resulted in 14,406 criminal convictions for fare evasion between April 2025 and March 2026. 

With several distinct rules and regulations in play alongside the standard legal framework, knowing your rights and responsibilities is key to ensuring a favourable outcome.

At Manak Solicitors, we take a bespoke approach to each case, using the individual circumstances of your situation to inform our strategy and determine the most appropriate course of action.

This tailored approach to fare evasion has enabled us to achieve consistent results for our clients, with 75% of our cases involving Transport for London not going to court between 2021 and 2024.

Whatever stage your case has reached, our team can evaluate the circumstances and provide you with the guidance and representation needed to help you make informed decisions.

The Process

1. Contact us as early as possible

You do not need to wait for a letter from Transport for London (TfL) before contacting us. If you have been stopped by a Revenue Inspector, questioned about your journey or told that you have been reported, we recommend seeking legal advice as early as possible. Where appropriate, we can proactively approach TfL on your behalf before you receive formal correspondence.

This gives us more time to understand what happened, review what you said when you were stopped and start gathering supporting mitigation. Evidence such as letters from doctors, employers or other professionals can take longer to obtain than the deadline TfL may eventually give you to respond.

Our solicitors have dealt with transport prosecutors for many years and can communicate with them directly on your behalf. In appropriate cases, early intervention may allow us to make representations before the investigation progresses further and seek to resolve the matter without prosecution.

2. TfL may send you a Verification Letter

If TfL is considering prosecution, its prosecutors may send you a Verification Letter asking you to provide an explanation or comments about the alleged offence. TfL’s Revenue Enforcement and Prosecutions Policy confirms that these responses are considered when deciding whether to prosecute. It is therefore important not to treat this as a routine administrative letter. What you say at this stage could have a significant bearing on what happens next. We can review the allegation and any evidence available, advise you on your position and prepare a carefully considered response on your behalf.

TfL Verification Letter

3. TfL may investigate your travel history

TfL increasingly uses journey and ticketing data when investigating suspected fare evasion, particularly where it believes there may be a pattern of repeated behaviour. TfL says its Irregular Travel Analysis Platform uses ticketing and journey data, passenger information and CCTV to identify suspected persistent fare evasion. It also analyses contactless journey patterns and transaction history as part of its revenue protection activity.

If TfL raises concerns about multiple journeys rather than a single incident, we can review the journeys being questioned, establish the relevant circumstances and advise you before further information is provided.

4. You may be questioned or invited to an interview

Depending on the circumstances, TfL may question you under caution where it is investigating a suspected offence. TfL’s policy states that investigators will administer a PACE caution where questions are likely to result in admissions or confessions that could be prejudicial to the suspect’s case. TfL also confirms that suspected contactless fraud can result in an invitation to attend a formal interview. You should seek legal advice before answering questions or attending a formal interview. Depending on when you instruct us and the circumstances of your case, we may be able to approach TfL directly and make representations with the aim of resolving the matter without the investigation progressing further.

An example of an Interview Under Caution invitation.

5. We prepare representations to TfL

Once we understand what happened, we can prepare detailed representations to TfL on your behalf. These may address the alleged offence, explain the circumstances, provide relevant mitigation and include supporting evidence. Our aim, where appropriate, will be to persuade TfL that prosecution is not necessary.

TfL’s own enforcement policy confirms that explanations and comments provided by the passenger are taken into account when deciding whether to prosecute. TfL also says that after reviewing the evidence and supporting information, it may determine that prosecution would be disproportionate and issue a formal warning instead. The earlier you instruct us, the more opportunity we have to prepare your case before TfL makes its decision.

6. If TfL decides to prosecute

If TfL decides to prosecute, you may receive court documentation under the Single Justice Procedure. The real TfL court pack supplied to Manak shows how extensive this can be. It includes a covering letter, charge sheet, Single Justice Procedure guidance, plea form, financial information and the Revenue Control Officer’s witness statement.

That witness statement can be particularly important because it records the Revenue Control Officer’s account of what happened when you were originally stopped, including questions asked and answers given. If proceedings have already begun, it is not necessarily too late to seek legal advice. We can review the prosecution evidence, advise you on your plea and options, prepare representations or mitigation where appropriate and represent you throughout the proceedings.

An example of a TfL Single Justice Procedure Notice sent after a fare evasion case has progressed to prosecution.

An example of a Revenue Control Officer’s witness statement included within a TfL prosecution pack, recording the circumstances of the alleged offence and what was said when the passenger was stopped.

Enquire Now

How We’ve Helped Clients Facing TfL Prosecution

Conviction Set Aside → Formal Warning Secured

Our client had already been convicted in their absence following a fare evasion incident at King’s Cross St Pancras. We successfully reopened the case and made detailed representations to Transport for London, who agreed to issue a formal warning instead. The conviction did not stand, allowing our client to avoid a criminal record.

Freedom Pass Misuse → Law Student Avoids Prosecution

Our client, a law student and sole carer for a disabled family member, was facing prosecution after using a relative’s Freedom Pass. Despite court proceedings already having begun, we made detailed representations to Transport for London and successfully secured a formal warning, avoiding prosecution and a criminal conviction.

Child Zip Oyster Misuse → Regulated Career Protected

Our client, who worked in a regulated financial services role, was reported to Transport for London after using a child’s concessionary Zip Oyster card on multiple occasions. We made detailed representations highlighting their personal circumstances and the serious professional consequences of a conviction. TfL issued a formal warning, allowing our client to avoid a criminal record and protect their career.

Enquire Now
Lightning.

Enquire Now

Go
INSIGHT

Short-Faring Explained: What It Is and How Train Operators Prosecute It

Explore
INSIGHT

Penalty Fare vs Criminal Prosecution: What’s the Difference?

Explore
INSIGHT

What Happens If You Ignore a Fare Evasion Letter?

Explore

4

Locations

60

Staff

1

Standard

Perfectly located accessible placed for you

Biggin Hill

190 Main Road
Biggin Hill
Bromley
TN16 3BB

01959 577000

Explore
Gravesend

42 Windmill Street
Gravesend
Kent
DA12 1BA

01474 324 529

Explore
Orpington

265 High Street
Orpington
London
BR6 0NW

01689 870769

Explore
Sevenoaks

46 London Road
Sevenoaks
Kent
TN13 1AS

01732 207 207

Explore
We offer meetings via Zoom WhatsApp FaceTime Teams for your convenience
Sevenoaks

01732 207 207

Gravesend

01474 324 529

Manak Solicitors is a trading name of Manak Lawyers Limited registered at Companies’ House in England & Wales Company Number: 09877015

Manak Lawyers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA No. 627738, 628462, 648124 & 8009629.

Manak Lawyers Limited does not accept service by fax or email.