Legal Analysis of
"Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law" – Season 2 Premiere (19 May 2025)
On 19 May 2025, Channel 5 aired the season 2 premiere of Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law, offering viewers an inside look at the efforts of revenue protection teams tackling fare evasion on the UK’s rail network. The episode followed Transport for London (TFL) investigators, as well as South Western Railway officers, as they confronted fare evaders, ranging from simple to sophisticated cases. At Manak Solicitors, we watched the programme with keen interest, as it highlights the legal complexities surrounding fare evasion. In this area, our experienced team, led by Director Samir Moftah, has successfully represented countless clients. Below, we provide a legal analysis of the episode, exploring the implications of fare evasion and the critical role of expert legal representation.
The Scale of Fare Evasion and TFL’s Enforcement Approach
The programme underscored the staggering financial impact of fare evasion, costing TFL and other rail operators an estimated £240 million annually. The episode showcased TFL’s proactive enforcement strategy, with investigators using advanced tracking systems to identify suspicious activity, such as passengers tapping out at one end of a journey to underpay fares. One case involved a fare evader allegedly evading payment on multiple journeys using a free travel pass, specifically a Freedom Pass, highlighting the seriousness with which TFL pursues such cases. TFL have software which can identify suspicious travel patterns. This was a carefully executed operation in which the fare evader was identified using gate line data and CCTV footage. When stopped, the individual was questioned and asked to accept the journey, which was not paid for. Technically, the fae evader did not have to answer any questions beyond confirming their name and address. TFL, however, often appreciates cooperation and honesty when assessing cases.
From a legal perspective, fare evasion is typically prosecuted under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 or TFL’s byelaws, which cover offences like failing to produce a valid ticket or misusing travel passes. These can lead to fines or, in more serious cases, criminal convictions. The episode illustrated the discretionary power of revenue protection officers (RPOs) to issue warnings, penalty fares, or escalate matters to TFL’s Prosecution Team. There was an incident, for example, where the SouthWestern Trains officer very patiently informed a passenger over three times to go back through the barrier and pay for their ticket properly as they would have short-fared. Technically, an offence had already been committed, but the officer decided to use their discretion. This discretion is pivotal, as it shapes whether a case results in a simple penalty or a court summons, potentially impacting an individual’s employment and personal life.
Key Legal Takeaways
from the Episode
At Manak Solicitors, we often scrutinise the process involved at the initial scene. How a client conducts themselves at the scene will usually help determine our strategy for the case; for example, dishonesty or rudeness would need to be addressed.
The Prosecution
Process and Out-of-Court Settlements
The episode did not delve into what happens after an RPO refers a case to the Prosecution Team, but our experience at Manak Solicitors fills in the gaps. Typically, individuals receive a letter from TFL or the train operator requesting comments to be “taken into consideration” before deciding on prosecution. Without proactive intervention, these cases often proceed to court, potentially resulting in a criminal conviction under the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) or a full hearing.
The programme’s focus
on a fraudster misusing a free travel pass reflects a common scenario we
handle. Such cases would be pursued under a Railway Byelaw. However, as Samir
Moftah’s track record demonstrates, early intervention through formal written
representations can often persuade TFL to settle out of court, sparing clients
a criminal record. Our firm has secured a high number of such settlements,
leveraging our strong working relationship with train company prosecutors.
Why Legal Representation Matters
The Fare Dodgers
episode illustrates the high stakes of fare evasion cases, where a seemingly
minor infraction can escalate quickly. At Manak Solicitors, we understand the
anxiety that comes with receiving a prosecution letter or facing a court
summons. Our approach, honed over years of practice, focuses on early
intervention to avoid court proceedings. Samir Moftah, with over a decade of
experience and hundreds of five-star reviews, is well-placed to assess your
case, advise on strategy, and negotiate with prosecutors to minimise disruption
to your life.
For those featured in similar situations to those on the programme, we recommend you act quickly upon receiving a letter from TFL or a train operator. A 10-minute free consultation with our team can clarify your options, whether it’s challenging the evidence, negotiating a settlement, or preparing a robust defence in court.
Contact Manak Solicitors
If you’re facing a fare evasion allegation or have concerns about a past conviction, now is the time to act.
Visit our dedicated Fare Evasion page to book a consultation or contact our expert team directly.
Call us on 01689 870769
Email: [email protected]
Ask for Samir Moftah or a member of our dedicated Fare Evasion team.