A recent BBC News article https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/clyq88we2kko, published on 28 May 2025, highlighted South Western Railway’s (SWR) robust campaign against fare evasion, recovering £3.4 million from fare dodgers in a single year. Operating services between London Waterloo and regions including Surrey, Hampshire, Berkshire, Dorset, Devon, Somerset, and Wiltshire, SWR estimates that seven million ticketless journeys cost the operator £40 million annually. Among the cases spotlighted was one involving an offender who evaded £49,000 over five years a high-profile matter successfully handled by Manak Solicitors, led by our expert solicitor Samir Moftah. While respecting client confidentiality with consent from our client, we handled one of the largest cases in history of fare evasion. We wish to make clients aware of how our dedicated legal services can help you navigate fare evasion allegations with confidence.The £49,000 Case: A firm that you can rely onThe BBC article underscores the scale of fare evasion, with SWR’s enforcement officers working diligently to address ticketless travel, which costs the UK rail industry nearly £240 million annually. The £49,000 case, involving alleged fare evasion over five years, was a complex and high-stakes matter. Samir Moftah, a leading solicitor at Manak Solicitors, represented the client in this case and secured a successful outcome. This achievement demonstrates our firm’s ability to handle even the most challenging fare evasion cases, ensuring our clients receive the best possible resolution while protecting their rights and reputation. Our client avoided a criminal record.Understanding Fare Evasion ChallengesAs the BBC article notes, SWR acknowledges that “genuine mistakes happen,” but the operator is focused on tackling systematic abuse. Fare evasion allegations can lead to serious consequences, including fines of up to £1,000, criminal prosecution, or a criminal record that could impact employment and travel opportunities. Whether your case involves a single incident or a more complex matter like the £49,000 case, Manak Solicitors has the expertise to deliver results.How Manak Solicitors Can Help YouManak Solicitors specialises in representing clients accused of fare evasion on SWR and other transport networks, offering comprehensive legal support to achieve the best possible outcomes. Our services include:Case Assessment: We thoroughly review your case to ensure a strong submissions to settle cases.Protecting Your Future: We work to avoid criminal records, safeguarding your employment and travel prospects.Personalised Support: Every client receives clear, tailored guidance to navigate the process with confidence.Why Choose Manak Solicitors?With offices in London and Kent, Manak Solicitors is well-positioned to assist clients across SWR’s network and beyond. Samir Moftah’s success in the £49,000 case highlights our firm’s ability to deliver results in complex fare evasion matters. Our team’s expertise and client-focused approach make us the trusted choice for those facing fare evasion allegations.The BBC article emphasises the importance of addressing fare evasion, but it also underscores the need for expert legal representation. At Manak Solicitors, we’re committed to achieving outcomes like the one in the £49,000 case, helping clients move forward with peace of mind.Contact Manak Solicitors TodayIf you’re facing a fare evasion allegation on South Western Railway or any other transport network, don’t face it alone. Contact Manak Solicitors for a confidential consultation. Our expert team, led by Samir Moftah, is ready to fight for your rights and secure the best possible resolution. Visit our website at www.manaksolicitors.co.uk or call us at 01689 870769 to speak with Samir Moftah. Let us help you achieve a successful outcome, just as we did in the £49,000 case.Manak Solicitors – Your trusted partner in fare evasion disputes.

Your Trusted Partner in TFL Fare Evasion DisputesA recent article by The Independent (28 May 2025) brings to light the growing issue of fare evasion across Transport for London’s (TFL) network particularly the London Underground. With fare dodging reportedly costing TFL around £150 million annually, enforcement measures have intensified, and the penalties for passengers are steeper than ever.At Manak Solicitors, we understand how overwhelming a fare evasion allegation can feel. What may start as an honest mistake can quickly become a serious legal matter. Our experienced team offers calm, clear and expert legal support, ensuring your rights are protected and your case is handled with care.The TFL Fare Evasion CrackdownAccording to The Independent, TFL is increasing its use of revenue protection officers and advanced technologies, such as CCTV and ticket barrier data, to clamp down on fare evasion. Passengers found evading fares can face:Penalty fines of up to £1,000Criminal prosecutionA lasting criminal recordWhat may seem like a minor mistake, such as forgetting to tap in or using an invalid ticket, can escalate quickly without proper legal guidance.TFL has also introduced more measured enforcement options, such as warnings and out-of-court settlements. However, understanding and accessing these outcomes can be challenging without legal representation.How Manak Solicitors Can HelpWe specialise in fare evasion cases across the TFL network—including the Underground, buses, and trams. We know these cases often have more nuance than first meets the eye, and we’re here to help you navigate them.Our legal support includes:Expert Case Review: We analyse TFL's evidence to find discrepancies or possible defences, particularly in cases of mistaken or accidental fare evasion.Negotiation and Settlement: We strive to resolve cases through warnings or out-of-court agreements, whenever possible, thereby avoiding prosecution.Protecting Your Future: A criminal conviction can impact employment, visas, and travel. We work to protect your record and reputation.Tailored Legal Advice: Every case is unique. We help you understand your rights and the best course of action, whether that’s challenging the case, paying a penalty, or defending against prosecution.Why Choose Manak Solicitors?With offices in London and Kent, Manak Solicitors is well-placed to support clients across the TFL network. We combine in-depth legal expertise with a supportive, client-first approach to achieve the best possible outcomes for those facing fare evasion allegations.Meet Samir Moftah – Our Fare Evasion SpecialistSamir Moftah leads our fare evasion team. As a seasoned solicitor with extensive experience in TFL-related matters, Samir has helped countless clients avoid convictions and secure fair resolutions. His sharp legal knowledge and calm, methodical approach offer our clients reassurance and results.Need Support? Speak to Us TodayIf you've received a fare evasion letter or are facing prosecution from TFL, don’t panic; speak to us first. Our team, led by Samir Moftah, is here to guide you clearly and confidently through the process.Call us on 01689 870769Visit: www.manaksolicitors.co.ukManak Solicitors — Trusted, professional, and here to help. 

When a relationship or marriage breaks down, agreeing arrangements for your children can be difficult. There will almost always be some level of dispute between you and your ex-partner, and both of you will likely want what you believe to be in the best interests of your children.Often, separating parents can agree child arrangements between them. Unfortunately, this is sometimes impossible, and therefore assistance from a solicitor and/or a mediator is required to help you to reach an agreement.Sometimes, one parent may have concerns about the other parent’s ability to appropriately care for the child. This could be for a range of reasons, including their own anxieties, especially if they have historically provided more day-to-day care, or safeguarding concerns.In these circumstances, steps can be taken to assuage any concerns that the parent who is withholding contact may have. For example, the other parent could provide specific assurances, or contact could be supervised by an agreed friend or family member or take place in a contact centre.If child arrangements cannot be agreed outside of court, you would need to consider making an application to the court. Your solicitor will be able to advise you as to the best course of action.At Manak Solicitors, reaching a swift agreement in an amicable and conciliatory manner is at the forefront of our approach to such matters. Whether your dispute can be resolved swiftly, or if perhaps more work or even the intervention of the court is required, we will always endeavour to help you reach a resolution in a cost-effective, empathetic, and child-focused manner.Contact us today for a free 10-minute no obligation call.

Legal Analysis of "Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law" – Season 2 Premiere (19 May 2025) On 19 May 2025, Channel 5 aired the season 2 premiere of Fare Dodgers: At War with the Law, offering viewers an inside look at the efforts of revenue protection teams tackling fare evasion on the UK’s rail network. The episode followed Transport for London (TFL) investigators, as well as South Western Railway officers, as they confronted fare evaders, ranging from simple to sophisticated cases. At Manak Solicitors, we watched the programme with keen interest, as it highlights the legal complexities surrounding fare evasion. In this area, our experienced team, led by Director Samir Moftah, has successfully represented countless clients. Below, we provide a legal analysis of the episode, exploring the implications of fare evasion and the critical role of expert legal representation.The Scale of Fare Evasion and TFL’s Enforcement ApproachThe programme underscored the staggering financial impact of fare evasion, costing TFL and other rail operators an estimated £240 million annually. The episode showcased TFL’s proactive enforcement strategy, with investigators using advanced tracking systems to identify suspicious activity, such as passengers tapping out at one end of a journey to underpay fares. One case involved a fare evader allegedly evading payment on multiple journeys using a free travel pass, specifically a Freedom Pass, highlighting the seriousness with which TFL pursues such cases. TFL have software which can identify suspicious travel patterns. This was a carefully executed operation in which the fare evader was identified using gate line data and CCTV footage. When stopped, the individual was questioned and asked to accept the journey, which was not paid for. Technically, the fae evader did not have to answer any questions beyond confirming their name and address. TFL, however, often appreciates cooperation and honesty when assessing cases.From a legal perspective, fare evasion is typically prosecuted under the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 or TFL’s byelaws, which cover offences like failing to produce a valid ticket or misusing travel passes. These can lead to fines or, in more serious cases, criminal convictions. The episode illustrated the discretionary power of revenue protection officers (RPOs) to issue warnings, penalty fares, or escalate matters to TFL’s Prosecution Team. There was an incident, for example, where the SouthWestern Trains officer very patiently informed a passenger over three times to go back through the barrier and pay for their ticket properly as they would have short-fared. Technically, an offence had already been committed, but the officer decided to use their discretion. This discretion is pivotal, as it shapes whether a case results in a simple penalty or a court summons, potentially impacting an individual’s employment and personal life.Key Legal Takeaways from the Episode The Role of Revenue Protection Officers The programme highlighted the authority of RPOs to caution and interview suspected fare evaders on the spot. Legally, RPOs must adhere to proper procedure when questioning individuals, ensuring they are cautioned appropriately in accordance with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE). Failure to do so could weaken a prosecution case, providing an opportunity for skilled solicitors to challenge the evidence. At Manak Solicitors, we often scrutinise the process involved at the initial scene. How a client conducts themselves at the scene will usually help determine our strategy for the case; for example, dishonesty or rudeness would need to be addressed.The Prosecution Process and Out-of-Court Settlements The episode did not delve into what happens after an RPO refers a case to the Prosecution Team, but our experience at Manak Solicitors fills in the gaps. Typically, individuals receive a letter from TFL or the train operator requesting comments to be “taken into consideration” before deciding on prosecution. Without proactive intervention, these cases often proceed to court, potentially resulting in a criminal conviction under the Single Justice Procedure (SJP) or a full hearing.The programme’s focus on a fraudster misusing a free travel pass reflects a common scenario we handle. Such cases would be pursued under a Railway Byelaw. However, as Samir Moftah’s track record demonstrates, early intervention through formal written representations can often persuade TFL to settle out of court, sparing clients a criminal record. Our firm has secured a high number of such settlements, leveraging our strong working relationship with train company prosecutors. The Human Impact of Fare Evasion Allegations The programme’s portrayal of fare evaders ranged from opportunistic barrier-jumpers to calculated fraudsters, but it’s critical to recognise the human side of these cases. Many individuals we represent at Manak Solicitors face allegations due to genuine mistakes, such as using an invalid discount card or forgetting to tap in. A criminal conviction can have devastating consequences, including job loss or immigration issues. The episode’s depiction of TFL’s control centre, tracking suspicious activity, underscores the sophistication of modern enforcement, making legal advice essential to navigate these challenges. Why Legal Representation MattersThe Fare Dodgers episode illustrates the high stakes of fare evasion cases, where a seemingly minor infraction can escalate quickly. At Manak Solicitors, we understand the anxiety that comes with receiving a prosecution letter or facing a court summons. Our approach, honed over years of practice, focuses on early intervention to avoid court proceedings. Samir Moftah, with over a decade of experience and hundreds of five-star reviews, is well-placed to assess your case, advise on strategy, and negotiate with prosecutors to minimise disruption to your life. For those featured in similar situations to those on the programme, we recommend you act quickly upon receiving a letter from TFL or a train operator. A 10-minute free consultation with our team can clarify your options, whether it’s challenging the evidence, negotiating a settlement, or preparing a robust defence in court.Contact Manak SolicitorsIf you’re facing a fare evasion allegation or have concerns about a past conviction, now is the time to act. Visit our dedicated Fare Evasion page to book a consultation or contact our expert team directly.Call us on 01689 870769Email: [email protected] for Samir Moftah or a member of our dedicated Fare Evasion team. 

Understanding TOLATA Cases: How Manak Solicitors Can Help You Resolve Property DisputesProperty disputes can be stressful, particularly when they involve co-ownership or unclear beneficial interests. If you’re facing a disagreement over property ownership or usage, you may have come across the term “TOLATA”. But what exactly is a TOLATA case and how can Manak Solicitors assist you? In this blog post, we’ll explore TOLATA claims, their importance for unmarried couples and co-owners, and why our expert team at Manak Solicitors is your go-to choice for resolving these complex disputes.What Is a TOLATA Case?TOLATA stands for the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996, a key piece of UK legislation designed to settle disputes over property and land ownership. Unlike married couples who can rely on family law to divide assets during a divorce, unmarried couples, family members or co-owners often turn to TOLATA to resolve disagreements. A TOLATA case can determine: Ownership Shares: Who owns what percentage of a property. Sale of Property: Whether a property should be sold and how proceeds should be divided. Occupation Rights: Who has the right to live in or use the property.Common scenarios for TOLATA cases include unmarried couples separating, family members disputing inherited property or co-owners clashing over whether to sell. If you’re in one of these situations, Manak Solicitors has the expertise to guide you through the process.Why TOLATA Cases MatterFor unmarried couples or cohabitees, TOLATA is often the only legal recourse to protect your financial contributions to a property. For example, if you’ve paid towards a mortgage, renovations or upkeep but your name isn’t on the title deeds, a TOLATA claim can help you secure your rightful share. Without this legal framework, you risk losing out entirely. At Manak Solicitors, we understand the emotional and financial stakes involved and we’re here to fight for your interests.How Manak Solicitors Can Help with Your TOLATA CaseAt Manak Solicitors, our experienced property dispute team specialises in TOLATA cases across the UK. Here’s how we can assist:Expert Legal Advice: We assess your situation, review evidence like financial contributions or agreements and advise on the strength of your TOLATA claim. Negotiation and Mediation: Court battles can be costly and time-consuming. We prioritise alternative dispute resolution (ADR) to reach amicable solutions where possible. Court Representation: If your case goes to court, our skilled solicitors will represent you, presenting a robust case to secure the outcome you deserve. Tailored Solutions: Whether you want the property sold, your share recognised or occupation rights clarified, we customise our approach to your goals.Based in Kent with offices in Orpington, Sevenoaks and Gravesend, we proudly serve clients locally and nationwide, bringing a personal touch to every TOLATA case.The TOLATA Process: What to ExpectNavigating a TOLATA case can feel overwhelming but with Manak Solicitors by your side, it’s straightforward. Here’s a quick overview:  Step 1: Evidence Gathering: We help you compile proof of your contributions—think bank statements, receipts or written agreements. Step 2: Pre-Action Protocol: We contact the other party, outlining your claim and attempting negotiation or mediation. Step 3: Court Application: If no agreement is reached, we file a claim seeking a court ruling. Step 4: Resolution: The court decides ownership, sale or occupation and we ensure the outcome is enforced. Our team keeps you informed at every stage, minimising stress and maximising results.Why Choose Manak Solicitors for TOLATA Cases?  Proven Track Record: With years of experience in property law, we’ve successfully handled numerous TOLATA cases for clients across the UK. Local Expertise: Our Kent-based team understands the regional property market, giving us an edge in TOLATA disputes. Client-Focused Approach: We prioritise clear communication and cost-effective solutions, earning us glowing reviews from satisfied clients.Common TOLATA Case Examples  Unmarried Couple Breakup: One partner owns the home but the other contributed to the mortgage. We can help prove a beneficial interest. Family Property Dispute: Siblings disagree over an inherited home’s future. We can secure a fair division or sale. Co-Owner Stalemate: One co-owner wants to sell, the other doesn’t. We can push for a court-ordered sale if needed.Get Started with Manak Solicitors TodayIf you’re facing a property dispute and think a TOLATA case might apply, don’t wait. Time limits under the Limitation Act 1980 could affect your claim. Contact Manak Solicitors today for an initial consultation.Call us at 01689 870769 or Email [email protected] to speak with our TOLATA experts.Based in Orpington, Sevenoaks, Biggin Hill, Bromley and Gravesend, we’re ready to help you reclaim what’s yours.

How to Resolve a Fare Evasion Case with Govia Thameslink Without Waiting for a Notice of Intention to Prosecute – Expert Advice from Manak SolicitorsIf you’ve received a witness statement receipt from Govia Thameslink regarding fare evasion, you might be unsure about your next steps and whether you should wait for a notice of intention to prosecute. Many people assume they must wait for this notice before acting, but resolving the case early can often be more advantageous. At Manak Solicitors, we specialise in representing clients in fare evasion cases with Govia Thameslink. Our expert legal team can guide you through the process of settling your fare evasion case without waiting for a prosecution notice. In this guide, we’ll explain why resolving your fare evasion case quickly is beneficial, how to address the situation proactively, and how we can help you achieve the best outcome.What is a Witness Statement Receipt for Fare Evasion? A witness statement receipt is a formal document issued during the investigation of a fare evasion incident. It typically indicates that Govia Thameslink has gathered information about your alleged fare evasion and may be considering prosecution. The receipt outlines details of the alleged offence and is often provided after the train company has collected witness statements or other evidence. Receiving this document means you’re under investigation for fare evasion. However, it doesn’t mean you have to wait idly for further correspondence—you can take steps to resolve the matter swiftly.Can You Resolve Your Fare Evasion Case with Govia Thameslink Without Waiting for a Notice of Intention to Prosecute? While it’s common to wait for a notice of intention to prosecute (a formal letter stating the train company’s intent to pursue criminal charges), you can often resolve your fare evasion case beforehand. In fact, acting early can work in your favour. Here’s why: Settle the Case Without Court Involvement If you act promptly, you may be able to settle your fare evasion case directly with Govia Thameslink, avoiding formal prosecution. Many train operators, including Govia Thameslink, are willing to resolve fare evasion matters without pursuing criminal action if you demonstrate a willingness to rectify the situation. Settling early could involve: Paying the unpaid fare plus administrative charges. Negotiating a settlement to prevent the case from escalating to court. This approach helps you avoid a criminal record and may reduce any penalties. Why Waiting for a Prosecution Notice Isn’t Always NecessaryAlthough waiting for a notice of intention to prosecute might seem logical, there are strong reasons to act sooner. Addressing the situation immediately can offer significant advantages.The Benefits of Resolving Your Fare Evasion Case Quickly Avoid the Risk of a Criminal Conviction If your case proceeds to court, you risk receiving a criminal conviction for fare evasion. A conviction can have lasting consequences, such as: Challenges in securing employment, especially in sectors requiring background checks. Travel restrictions to certain countries that deny entry to individuals with criminal records. Harm to your personal and professional reputation. By resolving your case early, you significantly lower the risk of criminal prosecution and a criminal record. Minimise Penalties and Fines Waiting for a prosecution notice and allowing the case to reach court could result in higher fines and harsher penalties. Acting quickly, however, may allow you to negotiate a penalty fare or a reduced fine, keeping costs to a minimum. Early settlement not only avoids steeper fines but can also lead to a more affordable resolution, helping you manage the financial impact. Save Time and Reduce Stress Legal proceedings, particularly for fare evasion, can be stressful and time-consuming. Addressing the case early eliminates prolonged uncertainty and the anxiety of awaiting further action. An early resolution lets you move on without an unresolved matter weighing on your mind. Plus, by settling promptly, you avoid the need for a court appearance, which can be both time-intensive and emotionally taxing. Protect Your Professional Reputation If you work in a regulated field like finance, education, or healthcare, a fare evasion conviction could jeopardise your career. Many industries conduct background checks, and a conviction might harm your job prospects. Resolving the case quickly can prevent it from affecting your employment or future opportunities.How Manak Solicitors Can Help Resolve Your Case with Govia ThameslinkAt Manak Solicitors, we specialise in defending clients facing fare evasion investigations from Govia Thameslink. Our experienced team have a wealth of expertise in helping clients resolve fare evasion cases efficiently and effectively. Here’s how we can assist you: Early Negotiation with Govia Thameslink Once we take on your case, we’ll begin negotiations with Govia Thameslink straight away. We’ll aim to resolve your case quickly by securing an early settlement. This can often stop the matter from escalating to criminal prosecution. Comprehensive Case Review We’ll carefully examine all aspects of your case, including the witness statement receipt, to determine the best approach. Minimise Legal Consequences We’ll work tirelessly to keep the case out of court and avoid a criminal record. We have a 100% success rate of settling cases with Govia over many years and enjoy an excellent working relationship with them. Court Representation (If Necessary) If your case does proceed to court, Manak Solicitors will provide expert representation to protect your rights. We’ll strive for the best possible outcome. Contact Manak Solicitors TodayIf you’ve received a witness statement receipt from Govia Thameslink for fare evasion, it’s crucial to act swiftly. By addressing the issue early, you can often avoid the risks of criminal prosecution, reduce penalties, and safeguard your professional reputation. Contact Manak Solicitors today for expert legal advice and representation. Let us help you resolve your fare evasion case efficiently and minimise any long-term consequences. Manak Solicitors Phone: 01689 870769 Email: [email protected] Website: manaksolicitors.co.uk/services/fare-evasion/ Address: 265 High Street, Orpington, BR6 0NW   

How to Reopen a Fare Evasion Conviction If You Didn’t Receive the PaperworkIf you’ve been convicted of fare evasion without your knowledge, it can be a deeply unsettling experience. Many people find themselves in this situation, unsure of how to resolve it in their favour. How to Reopen a Fare Evasion Conviction with a Statutory Declaration – Expert Guidance from Manak SolicitorsA fare evasion conviction can carry serious consequences, such as fines, a criminal record, and potential professional or personal fallout. If you were convicted without knowing—perhaps because you didn’t receive paperwork like a summons—you have the right to challenge the conviction using a statutory declaration. At Manak Solicitors, we specialise in supporting individuals with fare evasion cases, ensuring your rights are upheld and your case is managed effectively. This guide explains how to reopen a fare evasion conviction by making a statutory declaration, outlines your legal options, and shows how Manak Solicitors can assist you. What is a Statutory Declaration? A statutory declaration is a formal legal statement, made under oath, confirming that you were unaware of the court proceedings that led to your conviction. Under Section 14 of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980, you can make a statutory declaration if: You were not served with court documents, such as a summons or notice of prosecution. You didn’t know about the conviction until after the proceedings had concluded. If the declaration is accepted, the conviction is set aside, and the case can be reopened or reheard.Why Might You Need a Statutory Declaration in Fare Evasion Cases?Many fare evasion cases are prosecuted under laws such as: Regulation of Railways Act 1889 Fraud Act 2006 Railway Byelaws If you didn’t receive the paperwork, it could be due to: Errors in the postal system. Incorrect address details held by the transport authority or court. Delays or failures in delivering the summons. Without proper notification, you lose the chance to respond, defend yourself, or settle the matter before a conviction is recorded, which can lead to fines, a criminal record, or enforcement action.Steps to Reopen a Fare Evasion Conviction Using a Statutory Declaration Identify the Conviction Contact the court that dealt with the case to confirm details of the conviction, including the date, charges, and sentence.   Obtain the case reference number and instructions on how to submit a statutory declaration. Prepare Your Statutory Declaration The declaration must clearly state that you were unaware of the proceedings that resulted in your conviction. Include your name, address, case details, and the reason you didn’t know (e.g., not receiving paperwork). Make the Declaration You must swear your statutory declaration in the presence of: A magistrate at a magistrates’ court, or A solicitor authorised to administer oaths. At this point, it’s strongly recommended to seek help from expert solicitors like Manak Solicitors to ensure your declaration is valid and thorough. Submit Your Declaration Within 21 Days Ideally, submit the statutory declaration within 21 days of discovering the conviction. If this deadline has passed, you may need to explain the delay, and legal representation can assist with this. Await the Outcome If the declaration is accepted, the conviction is set aside, and the case is reopened. The transport authority may then decide to re-prosecute or settle the matter out of court. How you handle the negotiation with the train company and the timing of such discussions is crucial.   How Manak Solicitors Can Help At Manak Solicitors, we have extensive experience supporting clients in fare evasion cases. Here’s how we can assist you in reopening your conviction: Drafting a Robust Statutory Declaration Our solicitors will meticulously prepare your statutory declaration, ensuring it meets all legal standards and clearly explains why you were unaware of the proceedings. Tactical Advice We are able to provide you with advice to ensure your statutory declaration is dealt with quickly. Court’s often quote a six month waiting time for the statutory declaration be processed, we help clients achieve this in a much quicker way. Negotiating with Transport Authorities In many instances, we can liaise with transport operators to resolve the matter without further court action. Offering Comprehensive Legal Support We know fare evasion cases can be stressful, particularly for professionals or those worried about their record. Our team provides tailored advice and guidance every step of the way. Why Choose Manak Solicitors for Fare Evasion Cases? Specialised Expertise: We have in-depth knowledge of fare evasion cases and statutory declarations. Proven Success: We’ve helped numerous clients overturn convictions and avoid unnecessary penalties. Discreet and Professional Service: We manage every case with confidentiality and care. Contact Manak Solicitors Today If you’ve been convicted of fare evasion without your knowledge, don’t let it affect your record or future. Act quickly to reopen your case with a statutory declaration. At Manak Solicitors, we’re here to guide you through the process and secure the best possible result. Contact us today for expert legal advice and representation. Let us help you resolve your fare evasion case efficiently and effectively. Manak Solicitors Phone: 01689 870769 Email: [email protected] Website: manaksolicitors.co.uk/services/fare-evasion/Address: 265 High Street, Orpington, BR6 0NW 

How a Fare Evasion Conviction Can Impact Your Visa or Right to Remain in the UK: Legal AnalysisFor non-UK nationals, a conviction for fare evasion may have significant repercussions under UK immigration law. While seemingly minor, it can raise concerns about an individual’s compliance with UK laws, affect their immigration status, and lead to visa refusals or delays in applications for indefinite leave to remain (ILR) or naturalisation.This article examines these issues in detail, referencing relevant statutes and Home Office guidance to clarify the legal and immigration implications of a fare evasion conviction.Criminal Convictions and Immigration Rules: The Legal FrameworkUnder the Immigration Rules and UK Borders Act 2007, the Home Office considers criminal convictions when assessing visa applications, extensions, ILR, and citizenship requests. Specific provisions include: Paragraph 322(1C) of the Immigration Rules: Criminal convictions can lead to mandatory refusal of visa or settlement applications if they involve custodial sentences. For non-custodial offences (e.g., fines for fare evasion), the Home Office evaluates whether the applicant demonstrates “good character” and compliance with UK law. Section 76 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002: This section empowers the Home Office to revoke ILR if a person’s conduct (including criminal behaviour) renders their presence in the UK undesirable. While fare evasion is unlikely to lead to immediate revocation, repeated offences or dishonesty could trigger such action. British Nationality Act 1981 (Section 41A): The "good character" requirement for naturalisation is explicitly referenced here. Convictions for offences like fare evasion may lead to refusals if they occurred within the preceding three years (or longer for more serious offences).Key Immigration Scenarios Impacted by Fare Evasion1. Visa Applications and Renewals The Home Office applies Part 9 of the Immigration Rules to evaluate whether an applicant’s criminal record makes them ineligible for a visa. Even non-custodial sentences, such as penalties for fare evasion, may lead to visa refusals under Paragraph 9.4.1, which states:"An application will normally be refused if the applicant has been convicted of a criminal offence and is considered not conducive to the public good."2. Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) Applicants for ILR must meet strict suitability criteria. Under Appendix FM of the Immigration Rules, a criminal conviction within two years prior to an application may result in a refusal. Even older offences can be problematic if they suggest a pattern of behaviour inconsistent with good character.3. British Citizenship The Home Office considers applicants’ character under Section 6 of the British Nationality Act 1981, focusing on whether they have upheld UK laws. According to the Nationality Guidance: Good Character (2023): Any conviction may lead to a refusal. Offences like fare evasion fall into the category of non-custodial convictions, but they are still significant if they occurred recently or demonstrate dishonesty.Good Character Requirement: A Key FactorThe Good Character Guidance emphasizes that criminal behaviour undermines an applicant’s standing for both settlement and citizenship. Fare evasion convictions can raise concerns about: Dishonesty: The Home Office often interprets fare evasion as a deliberate attempt to evade legal obligations, which may reflect poorly on an applicant's integrity. Lawfulness: A conviction suggests a failure to abide by UK laws, contradicting the expectations of visa holders or ILR applicants. For example, a fare evasion fine under Section 5(3) of the Regulation of Railways Act 1889 could lead to a three-year deferral of naturalisation eligibility under Home Office guidelines.Practical Consequences for Immigration Status1. Visa Refusals A conviction must be disclosed in all immigration applications. Under Section 8 of the Immigration Act 1971, providing false information or omitting a criminal conviction can result in visa refusals and even bans on future applications.2. ILR Revocation While rare for minor offences, the Home Office may use Section 76 of the 2002 Act to revoke ILR if an individual accumulates multiple convictions, even for minor offences like fare evasion. 3. Travel Restrictions Fare evasion convictions may also affect international travel. Countries like the USA and Canada require disclosure of all criminal convictions, regardless of severity, when applying for visas or entry.How We Can Help: Dual Expertise in Immigration and Fare Evasion DefenceOur firm provides specialist support in both fare evasion defence and immigration law, ensuring clients receive tailored advice to protect their status. We can assist with: Fare Evasion Defence: Negotiating out-of-court settlements to avoid criminal convictions. Representing you in court to minimize penalties and demonstrate mitigating circumstances. Immigration Advice: Evaluating how a conviction may impact visa or ILR applications. Advising on how to disclose convictions in immigration forms to meet legal requirements. Addressing concerns about "good character" in applications for ILR or naturalisation.Act Now to Protect Your FutureA fare evasion conviction can have significant and lasting implications for your immigration status, but proactive action can often prevent the worst outcomes. Whether you are facing a fare evasion allegation or need advice on its immigration impact, our experienced solicitors can help.Contact us today for expert guidance on fare evasion and immigration issues. Together, we can safeguard your legal and immigration future.Contact us today to arrange a confidential consultation. Let us help you navigate this difficult period with confidence. Manak SolicitorsPhone: 01689 870769Email: [email protected]: manaksolicitors.co.uk/services/fare-evasion/ Address: 265 High Street, Orpington, BR6 0NW

I am getting divorced; how will my finances be dealt with?If you are going through a divorce, you of course must also deal with the division of your assets. Often, people do not know where to start when considering how to deal with their assets. There are many things that may affect the settlement that is ultimately reached, including your financial resources, needs, contributions, ages, and other factors. Our expert family solicitors can help you to tackle the complexities of negotiating a financial settlement, without the need for matters to become overcomplicated or contentious. What is a financial settlement?After issuing financial proceedings, a 20-week ‘reflection period’ begins. During this period, you and your spouse can begin to think about how your assets will be divided after you separate. Once a settlement is reached, your solicitor will draft this into a formal court order, which is sent to the court online so that a judge can review it. If the judge considers the settlement fair and believes it to meet both of your needs, they will approve it, and it will then become legally binding and enforceable.How do I reach a financial settlement? To reach a financial settlement, you and your spouse must exchange financial disclosure, so that you are both aware of what the assets involved in the marriage are. You will then have the opportunity to raise any further queries that you may have. If an expert needs to be instructed, for example a pension or tax expert, your solicitor will advise you accordingly and will deal with this. Once there is full visibility as to all of the assets involved, your solicitor will begin to discuss potential offers of settlement with you. Once a settlement is reached, they will prepare your financial remedy order.What happens if my spouse and I cannot agree on how to divide our assets?If a settlement cannot be reached, there are a number of ways in which an agreement can be achieved. In the first instance, this is likely to be non-court dispute resolution, including mediation, arbitration, round table meetings, or private court proceedings, with a neutral barrister acting as a judge to help you to try to reach a settlement by advising on what you can expect if you do go to court. As a last resort, we would need to issue court proceedings. This usually includes one to three hearings, with the majority of matters being settled at the negotiation’ hearing, which will be the first or second hearing. We will always try our best to avoid court proceedings unless absolutely necessary. Will our assets always be divided equally? In a long marriage, the starting point for division of assets is 50/50. However, there can be a departure from this in either party’s favour to meet need. For example, if one person has less income (and therefore, a lower mortgage capacity) than the other, the lower earner may have an argument for a departure from equality. If any children of the marriage are to live with one parent, again that person may have an argument for a departure from equality and/or a delayed sale. Another situation where assets may not be divided equally is if it would be unfair, such as with a short marriage, you are both relatively young without children, and perhaps one of you already owned substantial property prior to the marriage, for example the matrimonial home. Sometimes, certain assets can be ‘ringfenced’, which means they are kept separately from the assets which are to be divided. This could include properties which either person owned before the marriage or inheritance. These are known as non-matrimonial assets. Do keep in mind that if there are limited matrimonial assets and needs cannot be met, a court could evade non matrimonial assets to meet need. What happens if our settlement is not approved by a judge?Occasionally, even if you reach a settlement and your solicitor prepares a financial remedy order reflecting this, when it is sent to the court the judge reviewing it may not approve it. Usually, this would be if the settlement was clearly unfair, or one person’s future needs cannot be met. In these circumstances, the judge will advise on why the settlement was not approved, and your solicitor will be able to help you to address this.Can I agree with my spouse on how we wish to divide our assets without a financial remedy order?We would strongly advise against simply dividing your assets without formalising this into a financial remedy order. If you do not have a court order recording the settlement that you have reached, this means that future financial claims are not dismissed and any agreement you have reached is not binding. Until you have such an order, your spouse can make a claim against your assets at any point. This can often be an issue where people have limited assets at the time of divorce so do not consider it necessary to have a financial order in place, but they later come into money, and their spouse then commences financial remedy proceedings. If you do have limited or no assets, at the very least you should have an order in place providing for a clean break between you. Sometimes, legal costs may be a deterrent to a person instructing a solicitor to help them to address their finances following a divorce. However, we consider this a small investment in comparison to the assets, both present and future, that you wish to protect.Speak to an expert If you are unsure on where to begin, book a free no-obligation call back so that you can better understand your position.