Facing a Chiltern Railways fare evasion prosecution? Manak Solicitors, led by Samir Moftah, secures out-of-court settlements to protect your career, visa, and peace of mind. Book a £125 consultation today.
Chiltern Railways operates strict revenue protection across its routes (e.g., London Marylebone to Birmingham, Oxford, High Wycombe). In 2024, their Fraud & Prosecutions Unit recovered £1,051,287 from 8,064 cases, including high-profile settlements, such as £15,000 for over 350 short-faring incidents.
Revenue Protection Officers at stations such as Marylebone and Oxford use ticket scanners (introduced in 2024) and CCTV.
- Inspectors issue witness statement receipts (including badge number, journey details, and your information).
- Chiltern’s “Buy Before You Board” campaign and Trainline app history analysis target repeat offenders.
Chiltern Railways work in a very particular way for their prosecutions.
We deal with all Chiltern cases, which tend to be:
The majority of our clients have Trainline apps or similar and have committed a high number of offences without being caught previously.
When you are stopped by an inspector from Chiltern Railways, you will not be given anything. They will take your name and address and check your identification documents. We can resolve your case without you even receiving your letter, saving you months of stress and sleepless nights.
On occasion, you will receive a letter from them informing you that you have committed an offence and asking you to inform them of any circumstances they should take into account. If you do not persuade them to settle out of court, you will be prosecuted. Chiltern handles all work in-house and has intensified efforts to prevent fare evasion. We can resolve a matter out of court for you as soon as possible by persuading Chiltern to do so.
If you are unsuccessful, you will receive a court summons known as a single justice procedure notice. Chiltern often produces the summons and also includes a separate letter within the same documentation, inviting you to an interview.
This will state that the economic crime and fraud unit have submitted a data access request Legitimate interest based on recital 47 of the GDPR (prevention of fraud); and Schedule 1, Part 3, Legal Claims (33) of the Data Protection Act 2018 to various rail ticket retailers which will indicate fare evasion on other occasions. They will also ask you to provide a valid railcard if you hold one.
The single justice procedure notice itself will charge you with Byelaw 18 (1) of the Railway Byelaws made under Section 219 and Schedule 20 of the Transport Act 2000, by the Railways Act 2000, by the Railways Act 2005, in that you entered a non-compulsory ticket area to travel with the Railway without having a valid ticket entitling you to travel. There is often a second charge stating that under Byelaw 18 (2) of the Railway Byelaws made under section 219 and section 20 of the Transport Act 2000, by the Railways Act 2005, in that you failed to hand over a ticket for inspection and verification of validity when asked to so by an authorised person.
These offences are strict liability, meaning intention is irrelevant. If you fail to have a valid ticket or hand it over when asked to do so, you are likely to be found guilty.
You can also be charged under Section 5 (3) of the Regulation of Railways Act 1889, which sets out that if any person attempts to travel on a railway without having previously paid their fare, and with intent to avoid payment thereof, they commit an offence.
The consequences of being found guilty include having a criminal record for one year, after which it is expunged. You can also be fined up to £1,000. You would also need to pay Chiltern’s legal costs and any outstanding tickets. This often means that being found guilty is more expensive than settling a case out of court, which crucially avoids a criminal record.
We will be able to negotiate an out-of-court settlement, which will allow us to bypass the 21-day court limit to enter your plea and dispense with the interview, providing you with peace of mind and a quick resolution.
Samir Moftah has dealt with fare evasion cases for over ten years and has settled over 1,000 fare evasion cases from May 2021 to June 2024 alone, let alone the many years of successful settlements for clients before this. We handle Chiltern cases in high volumes and resolve each case for our clients, avoiding convictions. Samir is a Director and has been a qualified solicitor since 2010. You will deal with Samir only throughout your case, and he will give your case his full attention.
Samir represents regulated professionals, including lawyers, doctors, those in finance jobs, accountants, and those in the Civil Service. Samir also represents clients who are students or who reside in the UK with a visa or are applying for citizenship. Samir is trusted to deliver and has an excellent track record of success, and enjoys excellent relationships with all the train companies, prosecutors, and fraud departments in the country. Samir has hundreds of 5-star reviews from past clients. He enjoys helping clients to ease their stress, take control of their situation, and ultimately resolve matters so that they never have to worry about a prosecution in the future.
STUDY 1- Our client was working under an international visa. He did not have a valid ticket on more than one occasion and was stopped by an inspector. This led to the client being contacted by the fraud department as they were looking to prosecute which would have led to a criminal record. We were instructed by our client and were able to make representations to the prosecutor which led them to settle the case within one day. We had a very relieved client who was able to continue working and have no issues with his visa.
STUDY 2- Our client worked within the construction trade and due to insufficient funds had a short ticket for journeys over two months. Our client had not been contacted by the prosecution team but had been stopped and was anxious. We were able to quickly work on his case and have the matter settled promptly which allowed our client to remain in work and avoid a conviction.
STUDY 3- Our client had avoided his fares for over eight months by purchasing a short ticket. He was stopped by an inspector and had been written to. We were able to make representations to the prosecutor and were able to settle the case within one day.
STUDY 4- Our client had not paid for her fares for a number of months. She had been stopped by an inspector but not contacted by the prosecutor. We were able to contact them, obtain disclosure and make representations in order to have the case settled promptly. Our client was very relieved and very grateful as this allowed her to keep her job and travel abroad.
STUDY 5- Our client had not paid for her fares correctly for three years. She had been contacted by the prosecutor as they were looking to convict her given the extensive fare evasion. Through our legal submissions, we were able to persuade them to settle out of court which meant that our client did not have to attend court and avoided a conviction thus remaining in employment.
View our latest testimonials from real clients on reviewsolicitors.
We don't filter or cherry pick. What you see is what you get.
ible.
Manak Solicitors is a trading name of Manak Lawyers Limited registered at Companies’ House in England & Wales Company Number: 09877015
Manak Lawyers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA No. 627738, 628462, 648124, 8009629 & 8011568
Manak Lawyers Limited does not accept service by fax or email
Manak Solicitors is a trading name of Manak Lawyers Limited registered at Companies’ House in England & Wales Company Number: 09877015
Manak Lawyers Limited is authorised and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority under SRA No. 627738, 628462, 648124, 8009629 & 8011568
Manak Lawyers Limited does not accept service by fax or email
Quote
